Varvoglis effect sizes
I don’t have specific effect-size figures from Mario P. Varvoglis’s published work in the retrieved sources for this question.
To give you an accurate answer grounded in what ESP-Nexus holds, I’d need to know which of Varvoglis’s studies or analyses you’re asking about. He has published on several topics — including micro-PK (psychokinesis), replication failures, and statistical methodologies in parapsychology — and effect sizes differ across those bodies of work.
The Mario P. Varvoglis scientist page on ESP-Nexus covers his work and reasoning in detail, particularly his analyses of why micro-PK replication attempts have failed despite earlier positive findings. If you can specify which study, dataset, or finding you’re interested in — for example, his analysis of the PEAR micro-PK replication, or a specific primary experimental paper — I can retrieve the exact figures for you.
Alternatively, you could browse the references and studies cited on his page directly, or search the Studies section by topic if you’re looking for a particular experimental domain.
References
More questions answered
- Pool the effect sizes across every ganzfeld study you hold and compare your number to the published Storm and Tressoldi meta-analyses—do they agree?
- Has the effect size for PK data increased in the last 50 years?
- Tell me about the clairvoyance work of the last 50 years
- What trends can you see in precognition research?
- What trends can you see in ESP research in the last 50 years?
- What are parapsychology's current arguments to justify that the phenomena are real and should be taken seriously?