What effect size did Kugel report in 2011?

I don’t have a direct source reporting an effect size that Kugel specifically labeled or calculated in a 2011 publication.

Kugel’s 2011 paper in the Journal of Scientific Exploration [3] is a critical methodological analysis of psychokinesis meta-analyses — it examines and disputes the effect-size calculations reported by other researchers (Radin, Nelson, Bösch, Steinkamp, and Boller) in their PK meta-analyses, but the paper itself is a critique of those analyses rather than a report of Kugel’s own experimental result with an effect size.

If you’re asking about a specific finding or effect size Kugel reported in 2011, the retrieved sources don’t show it. The sources do include Kugel’s 2018 roulette-based precognition work [1], which reported a z-score of +3.27 (p = 0.0006) for the program’s prognosis module, and his earlier roulette studies from the 1990s [6], but not a 2011 effect-size figure.

Could you clarify which study or result you’re asking about? If you can point me to the specific claim or context, I may be able to locate the right source.

References
  1. Kugel, W. (2018). Amplifying Precognition: Four Experiments with Roulette. Zeitschrift für Anomalistik / Journal of Anomalistics, 18, 214. https://doi.org/10.23793/zfa.2018.214
  2. Kugel, W. (2013). Essay Review Mythos Hanussen 2001-2011 A collective review Wilfried Kugel 1 Werner Herzog (2001). Zeitschrift für Anomalistik / Journal of Anomalistics, 13, 196.
  3. Kugel, W. (2011). A Faulty PK Meta-Analysis. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 25.
  4. Tremmel (2014). Sind außergewöhnliche Erfahrungen lediglich Spontanfälle? Eine Antwort an Michae. Zeitschrift für Anomalistik / Journal of Anomalistics, 14, 292.
  5. Schneider, C. J. (2014). 189Political ideology…. Zeitschrift für Anomalistik / Journal of Anomalistics, 14, 189.
  6. European Journal of Parapsychology, volume 8. (n.d.). European Journal of Parapsychology, 8.
Deeper dives on ESP-Nexus

Ask another question