Who are the top 10 scientists in the database for quantity of data that you can currently analyze?
The question asks about the ESP-Nexus database specifically — which researchers have the largest quantity of data available for analysis within the site’s library. This is a site-structure question, and I need to be straightforward about what I can and cannot tell you from what’s available to me.
What the Library Can and Cannot Surface Here
The sources retrieved for this question do not contain a ranked inventory of researchers by data volume, and the CURRENT SITE DATA provided for this query does not include a count of that kind. Importantly, I cannot construct such a ranking by counting my own retrieved citations — the passages retrieved for any given query are a small sample of what the library holds, not an inventory of it, and counting them would produce a misleading and likely inaccurate figure.
What IS Queryable on the Site
The Scientists section is the right place to begin exploring which researchers have the deepest coverage on ESP-Nexus. Each researcher hub page aggregates the studies, spoke pages, and primary sources attached to that individual. The References page reflects the full bibliography of works cited across the site, which gives a signal (though not a direct ranking) of where citation density is highest.
The Honest Answer
A proper “top 10 by data volume” ranking would need to be queried directly from the site’s citation database — something that would require the site’s own internal tooling, not this assistant. If that’s a feature you’d find useful (a ranked view of researchers by number of associated studies, citations, or audited pages), that’s worth raising as a feature request through the site’s contact form, since it would genuinely help users understand where the library’s depth is concentrated.
What I can say is that the library’s primary focus is parapsychology research, and the Scientists section currently profiles the researchers for whom the deepest source coverage exists. Browsing that section will give you a practical sense of where the analytical depth is greatest.
More questions answered
- Pool the effect sizes across every ganzfeld study you hold and compare your number to the published Storm and Tressoldi meta-analyses—do they agree?
- Has the effect size for PK data increased in the last 50 years?
- Tell me about the clairvoyance work of the last 50 years
- What trends can you see in precognition research?
- What trends can you see in ESP research in the last 50 years?
- What are parapsychology's current arguments to justify that the phenomena are real and should be taken seriously?