Write a critique of Real Magic book.
Real Magic (Radin, 2018) appears in the retrieved sources only as a bibliographic entry — in the reference lists of Parker’s “Thought-Forms Gone Rogue” (2021) [4] and one JSE 35:1 volume [6]. The full citation is Radin, D. I. (2018). Real Magic: Ancient Wisdom, Modern Science, and a Guide to the Secret Power of the Universe. Harmony Books [4].
What the sources support
The sources retrieved for this question do not contain a substantive critique, review, or reanalysis of Real Magic — no evaluation of its arguments, its handling of evidence, or its claims. The book is only listed in bibliographies. I can’t reconstruct a grounded critique from these passages without inventing the content of one, which the site’s citation policy forbids.
A few things I can note honestly:
- Radin also authored Supernormal (2013), cited in the same Parker reference list [4] — indicating these sources engage Radin’s broader body of work at the citation level, but the retrieved excerpts don’t quote or assess Real Magic specifically.
- Under ESP-Nexus’s citation tiers, a book is a Tier C source — cited for context, not for specific empirical claims. So even where the site engages Real Magic, it would not be the anchor for a statistic or a study result; those would trace to the underlying primary literature the book draws on.
What would let me answer this properly
A genuine critique of the book would need retrieved sources that actually engage its content — a published review, a methodological objection, or a reanalysis of the evidence Radin marshals (for example, his treatment of meta-analytic effect sizes across psi domains). The excerpts here don’t include such material. That doesn’t mean the library lacks it — only that it wasn’t among the passages retrieved for this question.
If you’re interested in the critical literature on Radin’s evidentiary claims, a more productive route is to ask about a specific claim in the book (e.g., a particular meta-analysis or effect he cites), which would let me pull the relevant primary sources and the skeptical replies to them. You might also start from the Phenomena and Methodology sections, which treat the meta-analytic and replication questions the book relies on.
References
- Sommer, A. (2021). What is the Best Available Evidence for the Survival of Human Consciousness after Permanent Bodily Death? Bigelow Institute for Consciousness Studies.
- Mayer, G. A. (2020). Astrology and Science: A Precarious Relationship. Part 2: Considerations of Empirical Investigations on the Validity of Astrology. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 34, pp. 794–830. https://doi.org/10.31275/20201697
- Glazier, J. W., & Robinson, T. N. (2025). Decolonizing Possession: A Blueprint to Invisible Worlds. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 39, pp. 124–136. https://doi.org/10.31275/20253275
- Parker, A. (2021). Thought-Forms Gone Rogue: A Theory for Psi-Critics and Parapsychologists. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 35, pp. 91–128. https://doi.org/10.31275/20211901
- Zetetic Scholar, No. 11 (1983). (1983). Zetetic Scholar, 11.
- JSE 35:1 Spring 2021. (2021). Journal of Scientific Exploration, 35, pp. 1–256.
More questions answered
- Pool the effect sizes across every ganzfeld study you hold and compare your number to the published Storm and Tressoldi meta-analyses—do they agree?
- Has the effect size for PK data increased in the last 50 years?
- Tell me about the clairvoyance work of the last 50 years
- What trends can you see in precognition research?
- What trends can you see in ESP research in the last 50 years?
- What are parapsychology's current arguments to justify that the phenomena are real and should be taken seriously?